Why You Just Don’t Start with Back Story. Really.

It makes it difficult to keyboard this way, but I cannot withstand the cuteness.

I took the day off yesterday – from both day job and writing. We went for a walk, had breakfast on the patio, watched the 4th of July parade and then hung out. I did a lot of reading under the grape arbor. There may have been wine-drinking involved.

I’m reading a Famous Series by a Famous Author. I’m coming in after the series is complete. Some time ago I picked up one of the books in hardback, because it looked intriguing and right up my reading alley. Also I had really enjoy this author’s historical/time-travel romances. I tried several times to get into it and never got past page 52. (I know this, because when I got it out this weekend, that’s where I’d left it marked.)

Recently, several readers mentioned that Rogue’s Pawn has similarities to this series. When I said I’d never read it, they insisted I just must. (And no, this is not Stacia Kane’s Downside Ghost series. A reviewer made that comparison and I’m just tremendously flattered. Stacy’s on her 5th book in that series and, if you haven’t read it, this review might convince you.)

At any rate, convinced that my mistake had been in not starting with Book 1 in the series, I figured out what the title was by going to the author’s website. I couldn’t tell by looking at Amazon, and read it on the Kindle. And okay – it was definitely better that way. I understood more of the story, was more invested in the characters and was willing to continue. I’m told that if I read the whole series, the payoff is big. That’s when I pulled out the hardback again and started over.

And I discovered why I’d gotten so bogged down before.

She starts the book off with recap of the story so far and lots of back story. Really boring “and this happened and that happened and then…”

The other day I posted about not slavishly following the rules, but boy howdy – that rule about not starting with back story and info-dump? Totally confirmed.

So then, I’m trudging through all this recap and she mentions stuff that I know didn’t happen in Book 1. But nowhere on this book does it tell me where it falls in the series. I went back to the author website and discover my hardback is actually Book 3. I buy Book 2 on my Kindle and start reading.

Guess what? It’s almost exactly the same damn boilerplate recap she started Book 3 with. Clearly she wrote it for Book 2, then just slapped it into Book 3, with a few additional details for things that happened in Book 2.

I just don’t get it. I mean, I know it’s not easy weaving in back story. My friend Allison Pang really bled over that when she wrote her Book 2. All I can think is that the author is Famous enough that her editor let her get away with this.

Thing is – it’s awful. And it absolutely stopped me from getting into her series when I blithely picked up Book 3 without knowing it.

Now I feel much better about how I’ve handled back story in RP2.

If I ever do this boilerplate thing? Somebody slap me!

8 Replies to “Why You Just Don’t Start with Back Story. Really.”

  1. Whew. You had me a little worried when I started reading your post – because the rewrite I’m working on starts with backstory (and those who’ve read it say the book’s so much better now). Yeah, I can totally see how an info-dump of previous books in a series would throw a reader off. If I run into that in a series I’ve already been reading, I end up flipping through pages to get to where the new story actually begins – which is kinda irritating. There are ways to weave it in, people.

    I’m sure RP2 will be awesome, Jeffe. I can’t wait to read it.

    1. Sorry to have scared you! But you know how it is, if you’ve been revising the back story start and it’s better now.

  2. This is what stopped me from reading Girl with the Dragon Tattoo. The first one started off w/ extensive backstory. I put it down with zero intention of giving him a second try. But then I somehow started book two, which was much better, and finished both it and book three, hardly putting them down. I still haven’t gone back to the first one, though, since I’ve seen the movie and don’t feel any need to read it.

    But it raises an interesting point: How do these books become bestsellers despite the backstory dump in chapter one?

    1. It *is* an interesting question, Kathryn. Clearly people get through it. I know one of my CPs has a lot more tolerance for/interest in repetition or clarifying passages. I’m forever telling her to take stuff out, because she already told us that and she’s forever asking me to explain more and remind the reader of such and such. Also, I suspect that dedicated readers read pretty consistently until they finish a book, where a “big” book hits a population that reads in snippets. Maybe that gives them more tolerance?

  3. This also makes me think of something I hate as a reader (and it has basically nothing to do with writing). I HATE picking up a book and having no idea if it is the first second or thrid book. Why don’t they lable them! Come on! There have been a few books I haven’t bought because of this. I shouldn’t have to google it people! Lol

    1. I totally agree, Stacey, and that was part of my rant here. I don’t get why the publishers are coy about this. Obnoxious!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *